Did the Post Office commit perjury? Compliance expert answers vital questions regarding the Horizon scandal

The ITV drama series, based on a true story: “Mr. Bates vs. the Post Office,” has forced action on one of the worst miscarriages of justice in British history.

Ongoing developments have prompted a compliance expert from the compliance training service, Skillcast to provide insights into the intricacies of the case.

With the situation intensifying, Vivek Dodd, CEO of Skillcast, has offered his expert opinion and answered a few compliance-related questions regarding the case:

  1. What violations did Fujitsu’s unauthorised access and manipulation of financial data breach?

Upon legal confirmation, these actions could be deemed clear violations of existing laws and regulations, including the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

Vivek says, “The revelation during the trials that Fujitsu could access and manipulate financial figures on sub-postmasters’ local systems without their knowledge or consent raises grave concerns regarding breaches of data privacy and security regulations.”

  1. How does the deceptive information provided to sub-postmasters by Fujitsu elicit concerns regarding trust and potential violations?

“The deliberate misinformation provided to sub-postmasters, assuring them that no one had access to their systems, is a clear breach of trust,” Vivek states. “From a compliance standpoint, this deceptive practice violates employment and professional standards, which often prohibit false or misleading information provided to individuals in the workplace.

He continues, “If substantiated, charges related to perverting the course of justice and committing perjury must be pursued against the Post Office for providing false information during the trial and throughout mediation. This case exposes systemic flaws in the justice system, requiring immediate action to rectify injustices and hold those responsible accountable.”

  1. What potential concerns arise from the Post Office’s financial conduct?

Vivek asserts, “If the Post Office acquired funds from postmasters through deceptive means, it raises significant concerns of fraudulent activity. In the event of proven misconduct, the associated funds may be deemed proceeds of crime, potentially leading to money laundering charges against those involved in such facilitation.”

Moreover, he emphasises, “This situation highlights the immediate need to thoroughly examine all financial practices involved to preserve the public’s trust in institutional integrity.”

  1. What are the implications for the and possible legal consequences?

No disciplinary action has been initiated against senior Post Office staff to date. While the exact responsible parties remain unclear, this matter is anticipated to be subject to extensive investigation.

Vivek expresses, “These allegations pose a significant threat to the reputation and integrity of the Post Office, and if substantiated, may result in severe legal and financial repercussions for the involved parties.”

He adds, “If prosecuted, the involved parties, including staff who misled sub-postmasters, could face serious legal consequences, potentially leading to imprisonment, substantial financial penalties, and enduring damage to their professional reputations.”